Legal Opinion

Coppolino v. Noonan

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 2014PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER.

Before this Court, in our original jurisdiction, are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Richard Coppolino (Cop-polino) and the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP), Frank Noonan (Commissioner), on Coppolino’s Petition for Review in the Nature of a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (Petition). In his Petition, Coppolino asks this Court to direct the Commissioner to remove Coppolino’s name from the list of offenders required to comply with the provisions of the law known as Megan’s Law IV or the Sexual Offender Registration and…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Piasecki v. Court of Common Pleas, Bucks Cnty., PACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. State of Iowa v. Lloyd AschbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. DemoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. BrittonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. The Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP of PA and Environmental Quality Board of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API