Legal Opinion
Diwara v. State Board of Cosmetology
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 1, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
SENIOR Judge McCLOSKEY.
Ramata Diwara, Keita Komba, Ibrahima Diasse and Cheikh Kebe (collectively Petitioners) have filed a consolidated petition for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Department of State, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs and State Board of Cosmetology (Board), affirming individual orders by a hearing examiner that Petitioners had violated Section 2 of the Beauty Culture Law (Law),1 63 P.S. § 508, by operating a cosmetology shop without a license. We affirm.
The hearings were all heard and decided by the same hearing examiner. A separate hearing was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Cornwell v. HamiltonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
- Pennsylvania Medical Society v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. Allegheny Intermediate UnitCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Kirkpatrick v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs, State Board of Barber ExaminersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Justringz-Century III Mall v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs, State Board of CosmetologyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- A. Diop v. BPOA, State Board of Cosmetology of The Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Justringz-Century III Mall v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs, State Board of CosmetologyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.