Legal Opinion
Marks v. Tasman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 10, 1991No. 38 E.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 274 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LARSEN, Justice.
This is an appeal from the order of the Superior Court, 393 Pa.Super. 646, 564 A.2d 1012, affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment. Appellant Sidney E. Marks instituted this action in trespass against appellees Dr. William Tasman and Dr. William E. Benson, individually and trading as Springfield Realty Associates and against the Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority to recover for injuries sustained when he fell on the sidewalk outside of appellee doctors’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Davis v. Pennzoil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Overly v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Tom Morello Construction Co. v. Bridgeport Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by274 opinions
- Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Hayward v. Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
269 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.