Legal Opinion
Herring v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 25, 1936No. A-8995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county of operating a motor vehicle on the public highways, without having obtained a permit from the Corporation Commission, and was fined |750.
Defendant is charged with a violation, of section 3711, Oída. St. 1931, as amended by section 6, c. 156, Session Laws 1933. The charging part of the information is:
“That * * * said defendants * * * while acting conjointly and together, wilfully, unlawfully and wrongfully operated a certain motor vehicle * * * as a ‘Class B’ motor carrier, by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States Ex Rel. Cateches v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Herring v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
- Duck v. Arkansas Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.