Legal Opinion

Duck v. Arkansas Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 12, 1942No. 4-6694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

Appellee brought this action against appellant and another to enjoin them from operating so-called travel bureaus without first having obtained a permit so to do and without otherwise complying with the provisions of act No. 367 of the Acts of 1941, commonly known as the “Motor Carrier Act.” At the conclusion of the trial the court entered a decree as prayed against both defendants, but only appellant Duck has appealed.

The complaint alleged that appellant owns and operates a travel bureau in the city of Little Rock, at 116 Louisiana street, and advertises same under the name of A. A. Pulaski…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Francis v. AllenArizona Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dominguez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. People v. Van HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Dominguez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API