Legal Opinion

Hoeft v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1969No. 195PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Did the trial court err in instructing that the pedestrian had the right-of-way in crossing a street at an intersection where intersecting vehicular traffic was required to stop for posted signs

The trial judge, in essence, gave the jury the standard Wisconsin Jury Instruction, Civil, Part I, 1255, which recites that at a crosswalk or at an intersection not controlled by traffic control signals or by a traffic officer, the operator of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian who is crossing the highway within a marked or unmarked crosswalk. The court also included the admonition…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Diemel v. WeirichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fitzgerald v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Polzin v. HelmbrechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Department of Natural Resources v. City of ClintonvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API