Legal Opinion
Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1939PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed July 11, 1939:
Rosenberry, C. J.
Upon this appeal the questions presented fall into two general classes: (1) Those relating to procedure and due process, and (2) those relating to the merits or a consideration of the rate base, a fair rate of return, and the income of the company. We shall first consider those relating to procedure. It may be said at this point that the classification is not accurate and there is some overlapping.
Procedure.
Among other things, the trial court found:
“53. That the acts of the commission in the conduct of the proceedings before it,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- In INTEREST OF DH v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.