Legal Opinion

State v. Erickson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 17, 1981No. 80-137, 80-138, 80-139PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence uncovered in a warrantless inspection of a truck by state conservation wardens acting under secs. 23.61 (4) 2 and 29.33 (6), 3 Stats. The trial court determined that the warrantless inspection constituted an unlawful search under both art. I, §11 of the Wisconsin Constitution and the fourth and fourteenth amendments of the United State Constitution. 4 Because we conclude that sec. 29.33(6) authorizing the warrant-less search is constitutionally valid, and because the search was reasonably conducted in accordance with the statute,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tallman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SchweglerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. State v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Tallman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND OF INDIANS v. StateDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API