Legal Opinion

State v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1976No. 75-49PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnoe T. Hansen, J.

Consolidated was issued three citations alleging that certain of its vehicles exceeded the weight limitations prescribed by sec. 348.15, Stats. Trial was held on the first citation. It was stipulated by the parties that the decision reached as to that citation would be determinative of the decision as to all three charges.

The citation alleged that Consolidated violated sec. 348.15 (3) (b), Stats.:

“(3) For enforcement purposes only and in recognition of the possibility of increased weight on a particular wheel or axle or group of axles due to practical operating problems, including but not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Omernik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Donnelley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. State v. Dairyland Power CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Tiller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  5. Wisconsin Southern Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Labor & Farm Party v. Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Responsible Use of Rural & Agricultural Land v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Milwaukee v. LindnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API