Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel Valdez ANDAVERDE, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1995No. 94-30321PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEW, District Judge:

Gabriel Andaverde appeals from his criminal conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and for possessing a stolen firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j). He contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Fifth and Tenth Amendments, that several of his post-arrest statements were inadmissible, and that an insufficient interstate commerce nexus was shown at trial under 18 U.S.C. § 922(j). We affirm the district court on all issues relating to his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), but, in light of this court’s…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Antonio Rodriguez-Preciado, AKA Tony Rodriguez-PreciadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. United States v. Insook Kim, AKA in Sook KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API