United States v. Insook Kim, AKA in Sook Kim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals the district court’s order granting defendant-appellee Insook Kim’s (“Kim”) motion to suppress incriminating statements that she made during the execution of a search warrant at her store. The district court found that she was “in custody” for Miranda purposes, and therefore entitled to the familiar warnings before questioning began. The government appeals, contending that Kim was not in custody and therefore not entitled to the warnings. We affirm.
I
Investigators obtained evidence that Kim’s store, the “LiT Brick Deli,” was selling large…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- United States v. Sewn NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Antonio Rodriguez-Preciado, AKA Tony Rodriguez-PreciadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Roberto Cervantes-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Medina-VillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.