Legal Opinion
Fare v. Michael C.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 1, 1979No. 78-334PublishedCited by 1,548 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), this Court established certain procedural safeguards designed to protect the rights of an accused, under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, to be free from compelled self-incrimination during custodial interrogation. The Court specified, among other things, that if the accused indicates in any manner that he wishes to remain silent or to consult an attorney, interrogation must cease, and any statement obtained from him during interrogation thereafter may not be admitted against him at his trial. Id., at 444—445, 473-474.
In this case, the State of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,548 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
1,543 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.