Legal Opinion
Gesmundo v. Bush
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 9, 1947PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The defendants’ appeal from an award of compensation for frostbite was dismissed by the Superior Court. They appeal on the grounds that the statutory notice was not given, that the injury did not arise out of the employment and that no cansal connection between the injury and the plaintiffs disability was established.
The finding, as corrected by the commissioner, may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff was employed as a clerk by the named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant. On the afternoon of December 31, 1943, no other driver was available and the defendant’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- De Luca v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Stone v. HillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Savage v. St. Aeden's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bahre v. HogbloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Kulis v. MollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Posko v. Climatic Control Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Farlow v. Andrews CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Black v. London & Egazarian Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.