Legal Opinion

Shotkin v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1948No. 3605PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

In August, 1943, Bernard M. Shotin, acting as trustee for his minor children, instituted this action against Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company and others for injunctive relief and damages under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. From time to time, plaintiff filed numerous groundless motions and engaged in tactics indicating a studied purpose to drag the case along without trial. On March 11, 1947, the court entered an order reciting ■that no progress had been made in the case during the preceding year and that it should be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Raggio v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Silver v. EakinsMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Brown v. HaymoreArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. United States v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Charles A. Meeker v. Carl A. Rizley, R. L. Minton, Lee H. Bullard, J. M. Burden, and v. P. McClainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Fred Engelhardt, D/B/A Engelhardt's Camera Store v. Bell & Howell Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API