Legal Opinion

Brown v. Haymore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1934No. Civil No. 3380PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

O. H. Brown, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Arthur S. Haymore, David F. Haymore, and Walter T. Haymore, as executors of the estate of Franklin D. Haymore, deceased, hereinafter called defendants, to recover the value of certain medical services, which plaintiff alleged he had performed at the request of deceased. On October 28, 1932, the action was dismissed for want of prosecution. Thereafter plaintiff moved to reinstate the action and to correct the minutes of the trial court, which motions being denied this appeal was taken.

The record shows the following facts: The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sanitary District of Chicago v. ChapinIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Grigsby v. Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Jenkins v. SkeltonArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Burbage v. JedlickaArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Arnett v. HardwickArizona Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shotkin v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Harris v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Smith v. RabbArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Hackin v. First National Bank of Arizona, PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API