Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1940No. 9510, 9511PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
January 22, 1936, T. M. B. Hicks, Jr., the appellant herein filed a complaint in the court below, naming as defendants the present appellees. Following the disposition of sundry demurrers, motions, etc., an amended complaint was filed to which demurrers were also interposed upon the grounds that the plaintiff lacked legal capacity to sue as to one cause of action; that the two causes of action were improperly joined; and that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. The plaintiff refused to plead further and the action was dismissed, with prejudice. He appealed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Homer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Nathan J. Warren, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Fidelity Philadelphia Trust Company v. Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.