Legal Opinion

McGlasson v. Scott

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court.- ' Certiorari to tost the validity of an order imposing fines and imprisonment for contempt for violation of au injunction restraining a liquor nuisance.

1Opinion of the CourtShebwin, J.

1 In 1897, by decree of the distinct court of Mahaska county, Judge Dewey, presiding, the plaintiffs were permanently enjoined from maintaining a liquor nuisance. Proceedings to punish them for contempt for its violation were begun and tried in 1899, before the defendant at chambers. The information forming the basis of the proceedings was general in its character, and did not specifically name the building wherein it was claimed the liquor was sold, nor did it give the names of .those to whom sales were charged to have been made. Section 2407 of the Code, upon which the action was based,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Case v. PlatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  2. Balm v. NunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Haaren v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Joyner v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Tucker v. State Ex Rel. SnowWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Lucia v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API