Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State Ex Rel. Snow

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1926No. 1265PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

OPINION

1. The first point urged herein is that the court ought to have permitted a change of judge in the contempt proceeding. The court refused to permit such change, upon the ground that the affidavit therefor was filed more than thirty days after service of the summons in the main ease. Section 6419, W. C. S. 1920, provides, among other things, that if a party to a civil action in any district court of the state, files an affidavit alleging, among other things, that the person making the affidavit believes that, on account of tbe bias or prejudice or interest of tbe…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Gompers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lewinsohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
  4. Hake v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. KuselWyoming Supreme Court · 1923

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Thomas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. SodergrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Horn v. District Court, Ninth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API