Haaren v. Mould
Supreme Court of Iowa
Original proceedings instituted in this court to review the acts of the respondent, as judge of the district court, in finding the complainants .guilty of a contempt and assessing a penalty therefor. The two cases are presented in a single record, and depend upon altogether similar facts. Both will be disposed of in a single opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The return of the respondent, to which alone this court must look for the facts in the case, shows that on April 4, 1908, one H. H. Sawyer filed in the office of the clerk of the Woodbury district court an information charging Frank Haaren, complainant, with con*298tempt of the authority of said court in the violation of an injunction theretofore issued against him at the suit of said Sawyer. A copy of the alleged decree was attached to the information, showing that at the suit of said Sawyer the said district court, Hon. John F. Oliver, presiding, did on June 8, 1907, permanently enjoin and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gardner v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Kelly v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- State ex rel. Marr v. StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Jordan v. Circuit Court of Wapello Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bales v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
- Britven v. BritvenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Joyner v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Paridy v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.