Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Utterback

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 14, 1923PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

On or about the 30th day of December, 1922, the petitioners herein and each of them were permanently enjoined by order of the district court of Polk County, Iowa, from keeping for sale or selling intoxicating liquors, in violation of law. The petitioners were found guilty of contempt in violating said order of injunction, and prosecute this action in certiorari, to review the action of the lower court in so finding them guilty.

I. It is petitioners’ first contention that the trial court failed and neglected to make a ruling upon certain evidence offered during the trial. The petitioners fail…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. TonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Haaren v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Finnegan v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Foster v. HinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Graham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Benton Ex Rel. Benton v. PellumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Mayes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API