Legal Opinion

People v. Arguello

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1966No. Crim. 11151PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*415KAUS, J.

A jury found defendant guilty on a count charging him with possession of heroin for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500.5.) Outside of the presence of the jury defendant had admitted a conviction of murder suffered in 1950. A motion for new trial was denied, but the court reduced the offense to simple possession of heroin. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500.) Defendant appeals.

We take the statement of facts leading to defendant’s arrest and the seizure of the heroin from his own brief: “Various officers of the State Narcotic Agency and members of the Los Angeles Police Department,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. WheelerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. People v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Kinney v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API