Legal Opinion

Fahy v. Connecticut

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 2, 1963No. 19PublishedCited by 1,683 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren

Petitioner waived trial by jury and was convicted in a Connecticut state court of wilfully injuring a public building in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 53-45 (a). Specifically, petitioner and his codefendant Arnold1 were found guilty of having painted swastikas *86on a Norwalk, Connecticut, synagogue. The trial took place before our decision in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643, but the conviction was affirmed on appeal after that decision. Connecticut v. Fahy, 149 Conn. 577, 183 A. 2d 256 (1962). At the trial of the case, a can of black paint and a paint brush were admitted into evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,683 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

1,678 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API