Kinney v. County of Contra Costa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Nadine Kinney and her husband Rodney Kinney, plaintiffs below, commenced an action against Don Vallentyne, a private citizen, Roy Wallis, a sheriff’s deputy, and the County of Contra Costa. As to Wallis and the county, relief was sought based on false arrest and false imprisonment. As to the county alone additional relief was sought for “failure to provide medical attention” and “failure to take before a magistrate without unnecessary delay.”
At the close of plaintiffs’ case the trial court granted motions of the county and Wallis for nonsuit on the issues of false arrest,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Shakespeare v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. GarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Abbott v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Shane Horton v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Castaneda v. Department of Corrections & RehabilationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Watson v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Zeilman v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.