Legal Opinion

Madrid v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 29, 1995No. 92C-11138; 92C-11696; CA A84207PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Plaintiff, as guardian ad litem for Kenneth Madrid (Madrid), brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained when Madrid was struck by a vehicle operated by defendant. Plaintiff also brought an action on her own behalf for loss of consortium. The cases were consolidated for trial and the jury returned a verdict for defendant, finding that he was not negligent. The trial court denied plaintiffs motion for a new trial and she appeals. We reverse.

On November 8, 1990, at approximately 5:00 p.m., Madrid was jogging westbound alongside the eastbound lanes of Highway 22 in Marion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Martin Engineering Co., Inc. v. OptonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. French v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. DeRosa v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Madrid v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. RossiterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API