Legal Opinion

United States of America, and Bertha Mae Tabbytite, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Glen M. Clarke

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1976No. 74--1659PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before DUNIWAY, TRASK and SNEED, Circuit Judges. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

The United States, joined by Bertha Mae Tabbytite as an intervenor, brought suit to enjoin the defendant class from trespassing on land patented to Tabby-tite, an Indian, under 25 U.S.C. §§ 331-32 as an Indian trust allotment, and to recover compensatory and punitive damages for trespass upon that land from 1958 through 1969. The district court denied an injunction, finding that the defendants had an easement implied by necessity across Tabbytite’s land, but awarded plaintiffs $3,500 in compensatory damages —…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. Michael Dunn (Aka Mike Dunn)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Cyril E. Smith v. Vivian DefreitasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. BuchananSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Imperial Granite Co. v. Pala Band of Mission IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Harold Blake and Margaret Carlson, and Cross-Defendants v. G. Ray Arnett, Simpson Timber Company, a Corporation, Cross-Plaintiff AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Law Offices of Vincent Vitale, P.C. v. TabbytiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. United States v. Glen M. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API