Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Dunn (Aka Mike Dunn)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1973No. 24380PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.

This matter involves a dispute between the government and a group of persons, defendants, below, who are asserting an easement for a road across public lands.1 It is here on defendant’s appeal from partial summary judgment holding defendants trespassers and the government entitled to immediate possession of the government lands over which defendants were constructing portions of the road at the time this suit was commenced.

We conclude the judgment cannot stand. Summary judgment may not be entered unless, in the language of Rule 56(c) Fed.R.Civ.P., “. . . the pleadings,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Broder v. Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Central Pacific Railway Co. v. Alameda CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Superior Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kinscherff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. McFarland v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Humboldt County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Montana Wilderness Ass'n v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1980
  5. Fitzgerald Living Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API