Legal Opinion
United States v. Glen M. Clarke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1979No. 77-2571, 77-3469PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
The United States filed this trespass suit as the owner in fee title of property held in trust after its patent to an Indian by allotment. See 25 U.S.C. §§ 331-332. A complete background of the case is set forth in our earlier opinion, United States v. Clarke, 529 F.2d 984 (9th Cir. 1976). The dispute concerns a road that was built on property of the Indian owner by a private party. The private owner’s interest in the road later was transferred to a political subdivision of the State of Alaska.
In this phase of the proceedings, the United States sought an injunction…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State, Department of Highways v. CrosbyAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- United States of America, and Bertha Mae Tabbytite, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Glen M. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Law Offices of Vincent Vitale, P.C. v. TabbytiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Heffle v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Heffle v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Law Offices of Vincent Vitale, P.C. v. TabbytiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1997