Harold Blake and Margaret Carlson, and Cross-Defendants v. G. Ray Arnett, Simpson Timber Company, a Corporation, Cross-Plaintiff And
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Before us are two appeals. No. 79 — 1484 is from an order of Judge Burke certifying a class of cross-defendants, appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). No. 80-1276 is from a summary judgment of Judge Schnacke in favor of Simpson Timber Company and against plaintiffs Blake and Carlson, made appealable under Rule 54(b), F.R. Civ.P.
I
We first consider appeal No. 80 — 4276. We affirm.
A. Facts.
Appellants Blake and Carlson are Yurok Indians. The case concerns their claimed rights to enter and cross lands of Simpson Timber Company to exercise Yurok hunting arid fishing rights.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Michael Wang v. Robert Masaitis, U.S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Catfish Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1993
- In Re Asbestos LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- State of Wisconsin, Cross-Appellant v. Odric Baker, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gig and Jeannette Eberhardt, United States of America v. Tom Wilson and Sonny Erickson, United States of America v. Diane Sue Mattz, Atone ("Tony") W. Folkins, and Randy MattzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.