Legal Opinion

Law Offices of Vincent Vitale, P.C. v. Tabbytite

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1997No. S-7351, S-7542PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Federal statute 25 U.S.C. § 410 (1994) insulates from the reach of creditors proceeds from the sale or lease of Indian allotment lands. A road which became public was illegally built on Bertha Mae Tabbytite’s allotment. More than two decades later, the land on which the road was located was formally taken in condemnation proceedings and a money judgment in her favor was entered. The main question in this case is whether the proceeds from this judgment are protected under section 410. We answer in the affirmative because we conclude that the judgment is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Testa v. KattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Squire v. CapoemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Asher v. ALKAN SHELTER, LLC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Williams v. EngenAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. First Citizens Bank & Trust Company, Resp/cross-app V Robert Randall Harrison, App/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API