Legal Opinion
In Re Fisher
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 9, 2009No. 07SA383Published
1Opinion of the Court
202 P.3d 1186 (2009)
In the Matter of Robert Scott FISHER.
No. 07SA383.
Supreme Court of Colorado.
February 9, 2009.
Rehearing Denied March 2, 2009.
John S. Gleason, Regulation Counsel, Charles E. Mortimer, Jr., Assistant Regulation Counsel, Denver, Colorado, Attorney for the People.
Robert Scott Fisher, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Pro se.
Justice MARTINEZ delivered the Opinion of the Court.
I. Introduction
In this attorney discipline case, both Attorney Regulation Counsel and lawyer Robert Scott Fisher appeal the decision of the Hearing Board. In 2005, Fisher was charged with violating numerous Rules…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re RosenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. RaderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- In Re CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.