State ex rel. Zakany v. Avellone

Per Curiám.

Eelator argues that the trial court had no power to grant the alimony pendente lite because the request for such alimony was not in conformity with Civ. E. 75 (M) (1). which requires that such request be contained “* * * in the complaint, answer, or counterclaim, or by motion served with the pleading * * The request in. this case was contained in a counterclaim which was voluntarily dismissed, but the request for alimony was renewed by *26motion. . .Relator further wishes to prevent respondent from punishing him for contempt of court, claiming that such action is an unauthorized…