Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Adler v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1980No. 79-679PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before this court is, simply, whether a writ of prohibition should issue in this cause to prevent respondent court from proceeding with the matter before it.

A writ of prohibition will not issue against a court unless it is about to exercise judicial power and “the exercise of such power must amount to an unauthorized usurpation of judicial power.” State, ex rel. Zakany, v. Avellone (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 25, 26.

In the cause before us, the Court of Common Pleas had *3original jurisdiction in the action relator seeks to prohibit. The action of respondent in denying relator’s motion to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gilla v. FellerhoffOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Marsh v. Goldthorpe, MayorOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Mansfield Telephone Co. v. MayerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State ex rel. Zakany v. AvelloneOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Wall v. GrossmanOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Shoop v. MitrovichOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Gray v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. DuBose v. Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API