Legal Opinion
Microvote Corp. v. Montgomery County
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 25, 1996No. Civil Action No. 96-4738PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
This court, a month or so ago, dismissed the amended complaint of Microvote Corporation (“Mierovote”) under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Now pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration limited to the court’s dismissal of Count II alleging unjust enrichment.
Microvote is a manufacturer and vendor of electronic voting machines. According to Count I of the amended complaint, the defendants Montgomery County (“County”) and its Commissioners breached an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown & Root Braun, Inc. v. Bogan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Ramara, Inc. v. Westfield InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Shouey Ex Rel. Litz v. Duck Head Apparel Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Lukas Ex Rel. Miller Energy Resources, Inc. v. McPeakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Lukas Ex Rel. Miller Energy Resources, Inc. v. McPeakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013