Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Since the result we reach is dictated by the jury’s answer to the contributory negligence issue, we assume arguendo, without deciding, that there was sufficient evidence of defendant’s negligence to carry the case to the jury and support an affirmative answer to the first issue. Moreover, by reason of the verdict on the contributory negligence issue, we find it unnecessary to determine whether the evidence shows that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
This is a product liability action tried upon a theory of negligence. Plaintiff seeks to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Douglas v. W. C. Mallison & SonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Parris v. M. A. Bruder & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
3Cited by113 opinions
- Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Tina BARRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Bryant v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.