Lukas Ex Rel. Miller Energy Resources, Inc. v. McPeak
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Dissent
DOWD, D., District Judge, dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
The issue on appeal is whether the district court correctly found that Plaintiff, in a shareholder derivative action, failed to adequately allege an excuse for pre-suit demand under Tennessee Rule 23.1 and Tenn. Ann.Code § 48-17-401(b). The decision turns upon the question, “What is the Tennessee substantive law requirement for pleading futility of demand?” To put the questions in terms of the parties’ arguments, “Is the Tennessee law of refusal governed by older decisional law, or by a Delaware standard referenced in a Tennessee…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Clutter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.