Herman v. Home Depot
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
We conclude that the District Court judge in this case had the authority to grant the plaintiff injunctive relief under G. L. c. 93A, § 9. We also conclude that the Appellate Division of the District Court (Appellate Division) was the appropriate tribunal to decide the defendant’s appeal.
This case began as a small claim action in the Quincy Division of the District Court Department. The plaintiff, pro se, alleged that the defendant had engaged in unfair and deceptive consumer •practices, within the meaning of G. L. c. 93A, § 2 (a), by “refus[ing] to place prices directly on the merchandise…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Walker v. Board of Appeals of HarwichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Buchannan v. MeisnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Cifizzari v. D'AnnunzioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ravnikar v. BogojavlenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Sperounes v. FareseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Zizza v. ZizzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Titcomb v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Edwards v. Sullivan & Cogliano Companies, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.