Legal Opinion
Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney General
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 3, 1980PublishedCited by 206 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuirico, J.
These cases were commenced by two complaints, one filed by the Attorney General seeking to enforce against Purity Supreme, Inc. (Purity), the Attorney General’s Regulation XII (A) (1) (regulation), promulgated by him pursuant to his authority under G. L. c. 93A, § 2 (c), and the other filed by Purity against the Attorney General seeking a declaration that the regulation is unconstitutional and otherwise invalid. The cases were submitted to a judge of the Superior Court on the pleadings and on an agreement of all material facts. Thereafter the judge, at the written request of the parties,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by206 opinions
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Bond Leather Co., Inc. v. Q.T. Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc. And Martin S. Nadler, Bond Leather Co., Inc. v. Q.T. Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc., Melvin Nadler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Hershenow v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.