Edwards v. Sullivan & Cogliano Companies, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
This is a Dist/Mun. Cts. RADA, Rule 8C, appeal by defendant Sullivan and Cogliano Companies, Inc. (“S & C”) following the entry of an $8,700.00 judgment in favor of plaintiff Ronald Edwards (“Edwards”) on his claims for breach of contract and equitable estoppel.2
Edwards was the sole witness to testify at the bench trial. The defendants rested at the close of the plaintiffs case, and made an oral motion for a “directed verdict,”3 which tiie trial judge denied. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, Haywood v. Massachusetts Automotive Group, Ltd., 1998 Mass. App.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Turnpike Motors, Inc. v. Newbury Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Clickner v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Medford Co-operative Bank v. SkerryMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
- Benzaquin v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003