Legal Opinion

Yorke Management v. Castro

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 7, 1989PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The plaintiff (Yorke) filed a summary process action in the Framingham Division of the District Court Department seeking unpaid rent and possession. The defendant (Castro) counterclaimed for .damages for breach of warranty of habitability and interference with quiet enjoyment under G. L. c. 186, § 14 (1988 ed.), for retaliatory eviction pursuant to G. L. c. 186, § 18 (1988 ed.), and for unfair and deceptive practices under G. L. c. 93A, § 2 (1988 ed.). The complaint for possession was dismissed as moot because Castro vacated the premises. A judgment was entered on Castro’s counterclaims and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kohl v. Silver Lake Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Darmetko v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Patry v. Liberty Mobilehome Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Mellor v. BermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Ianello v. Court Management Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API