Legal Opinion

Sperounes v. Farese

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 2007PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

In 2004, the Legislature enacted a Statewide one-trial system for civil cases. St. 2004, c. 252. It provided that a civil case could proceed to trial in the District Court “only if there is no reasonable likelihood that recovery by the plaintiff will exceed $25,000,” G. L. c. 218, § 19. The statute also provides that a judge in the District Court “may dismiss the case without *801prejudice” (emphasis added), where the requirements of § 19 are not satisfied, G. L. c. 218, § 19A; but that “[violation of the requirements for proceeding in the district court or Boston municipal court departments…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Ravnikar v. BogojavlenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Casseus v. E. Bus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  2. Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 3974 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Diamond Group, Inc. v. Selective Distribution International, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  4. Zizza v. ZizzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Telman v. BrinkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API