Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 29, 1994No. Nos. 458-89C, 475-89CPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge.
Introduction
This contract ease comes before the court on Defendant’s Motion For Leave To File An Amended Answer, Counterclaim, And Special Plea In Fraud, filed on March 14, 1994, pursuant to Rule 15 of the United States Court of Federal Claims (hereinafter RCFC 15). Plaintiff U.S. Roofing’s opposition thereto was filed on March 29,1994. Defendant filed a reply to plaintiffs opposition on April 11, 1994.
Plaintiffs opposition relies on the following as justifiable reasons why this court should deny defendant’s motion for leave to amend:(i) Prejudice will result…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. HoughamSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- First Nationwide Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Aey, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.