Legal Opinion

Aey, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 30, 2014No. 10-733CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

In this contract case, AEY, Inc. (“AEY”) contends that the United States Army (“the Army”) wrongfully withheld payment on two invoices submitted by AEY for ammunition delivered to the Army for use by Afghan troops and police. The government counterclaims that AEY is liable for forfeiture of its claims because the two invoices at issue pertain to a contract tainted by fraud in an unrelated, earlier aspect of contractual performance and that AEY additionally is liable for damages under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, for pri- or false invoices submitted…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API