Legal Opinion
First Nationwide Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 28, 2000No. 96-590CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending in this Winstar-related1 case are defendant’s motion for leave to file an amended answer; plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment; defendant’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment or, in the alternative, request for discovery; plaintiffs’ motion to strike certain testimony; and defendant’s motion for leave to file reply to plaintiffs’ supplemental brief. Oral argument was held on September 28, 2000. At oral argument, the court allowed the parties to file supplemental briefs. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to file an amended…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jennifer Venters v. City of Delphi and Larry IvesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Community Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Admiral Frank B. Kelso, Ii, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Kenneth P. Bidlack v. Wheelabrator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- First Nationwide Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- First Nationwide Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.