Legal Opinion

LaFond v. Rumler

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1998No. Docket 194797PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P.J.

Defendant appeals as of right the trial court’s order declaring that an addendum to a land contract was void because it constituted an unenforceable restraint on the right of alienation. We affirm.

i

Defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff, by means of a land contract, a parcel of property for $60,000. During negotiations over the terms of the contract, a third party offered to purchase the property for $80,000. However, defendant had an immediate need for the $20,000 down payment offered by plaintiff. Consequently, defendant and plaintiff agreed that plaintiff would purchase the property for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nichols v. Ann Arbor Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Webb v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Sloman v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. OsguthorpeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  2. First Public Corp. v. ParfetMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Cindy Schaaf v. Charlene ForbesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Clarence W Brown Jr Md v. Vassilios a Dimitropoulos MdMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API