Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. McCormick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by the appellees, against the appellant, upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:

“ $200. Chicago, III., Sept. 17th, 1873.
“ On or before the 1st day of January, 1874, for value received, the undersigned promises to pay C. H. McCormick & Bro., or order, at their office in the City of Chicago, Illinois, two hundred dollars, with-per cent, per annum, from July 1st, year as above, without relief from valuation or appraisement laws. It is also stipulated, that, should the collection of this note he enforced by law, a reasonable amount shall he allowed the holder as attorney’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diversy v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Rathbone v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Howe Machine Co. v. SimlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Bell v. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. HylandIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Tousignant v. Shafer Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Watts v. MoffettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API