Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Wheeler's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1902No. Docket No. 103Published

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Robert Edwards and Adam Lungen presented a claim against the estate of Austin K. Wheeler, deceased, for goods claimed to have been sold and delivered to a partnership of which decedent was a member. The claim was disallowed by the commissioners, and claimants appealed to the circuit court. Prom a judgment for defendant, claimants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

.Montgomery, J.

This case comes before the court on exceptions to findings of fact, and on assignments of error based upon the conclusions of law. The evidence taken upon the trial is not made a part of the record. It appears from the findings that Albert E. Waggoner and the deceased, Austin K. Wheeler, were engaged in business at Muskegon, Mich., manufacturing and selling a watchman’s electric clock, under the firm name of the Wag-goner Watchman Clock Company. This clock was invented by Albert E. Waggoner, and he had assigned a half interest in the invention to Austin K. Wheeler. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sibley v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hall v. HeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Tousignant v. Shafer Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Morrill v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API