Weinstein v. Sprecher
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
Max and Florence Weinstein 1 wanted to invest in real estate. E. E. Sprecher, M.D., a Seattle orthopedic surgeon, and wife, who were sometime real estate investors, had a parcel for sale. Dr. Sprecher gave an exclusive broker’s listing to Erwin C. Goodwin. The written agreement described the tract as containing “30 acres more or less.” Goodwin promptly found a potential buyer, the respondent Weinstein. Max Weinstein examined the listing agreement, and the broker indicated that the land contained “30 acres more or less.” Weinstein and the broker viewed the land together from a road, but…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Hanson v. TompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Frisell v. NewmanWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Tennant v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Alexander Myers & Co. v. HopkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Woods v. Label Investment Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Murphree v. RawlingsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.