Legal Opinion
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 2014No. A12-709PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Respondent Darrel Schmitz commenced an action against his former employer, appellant United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel), alleging, among other things, retaliatory-discharge and threat-to-discharge claims under the Workers’ Compensation Act (WCA), MinmStat. §§ 176.001-.862 (2012). After various proceedings below, we granted U.S. Steel’s petition for review on two issues. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the court of appeals and hold that: (1) Schmitz has the right to a jury trial on his retalia*671tory-diseharge claim under Minn.Stat. § 176.82, subd. 1; and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daniel v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Yvette Ford v. Minneapolis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- McClain v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. v. Racheal L. Hooten f/k/a Racheal L. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Benner v. Saint Paul Public Schools, I.S.D. 625District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.