Legal Opinion
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 27, 2019No. A17-0141PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHUTICH, Justice.
In this interlocutory appeal, we consider whether an employee-who was injured while working and received workers' compensation benefits-may bring claims for disability discrimination against his employer under the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Appellant Keith Daniel, a firefighter for the Minneapolis Fire Department ("Department"), sued respondent City of Minneapolis ("City"), alleging that, while he was working for the Department, the City discriminated against him by failing to accommodate his disability and retaliating against him for seeking an accommodation.
The City moved…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Goodman v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dutcher v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- E.M. v. Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- J.S. v. Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Ken Martin v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, The Legal Marijuana Now Party, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- McKinley Juner Phillips v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.