Legal Opinion
Saldivar v. Momah
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 24, 2008No. 34891-8-IIPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 Following a bench trial, Perla and Albert Saldivar appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their case against Dennis Momah, Charles Momah, and U.S. Healthworks for damages caused by alleged sexual abuse, as well as the trial court’s ruling in favor of Dennis’s1 counterclaims. The Saldivars argue (1) they are immune from liability under RCW 4.24.510, (2) the trial court erred when it denied them a jury trial, (3) the trial court erred when it found them liable for abuse of process, and (4) the trial court erred when it excluded certain evidence. In addition, the Saldivars’ attorney, Harish…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against StarczewskiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Hickok-Knight v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Vargas Ramirez v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.